Call for Expressions of interest.

26 May 2015 Special Council Meeting

Closed Derwent Valley Council meeting on the 26th May to discuss the selling or leasing of Willow Court and expression of interest documents.

It is expected that the Expression of interest will take up to 12 months, so the site will be left abandoned again for that period of time.

 

Councillor Bester responds to this post HERE and points out that it was not a closed meeting as I have reported ( I agree that this is right).

He then goes on to write and suggest that the only source of truth about Willow Court is the “Councillors” of the Derwent Valley Council.

As we have previously seen, all have their own agenda and political futures to protect as is witnessed each time the State election is called.

While I suggest The Council is important in holding the current ownership of the site, anyone who looks back at the past 15 year after the closure of Willow Court, many of those that the Derwent Valley Council has had a leading roll in Willow Court, the proof of the work and negotiation can be found in the site as it is today.

What’s not so good is when opinions are presented as facts” Councillor Bester tells us “opinions as fact” when the statements he refers to were those spoken either at Council meetings or by Councillors attending Friends of Willow Court meetings. So the only fact is the very confused messages that leak out of the Derwent Valley Council and from the many sources.

Here are some facts:

The Derwent Valley Council have no plans for Willow Court (Stated by a Councillor) Witnessed, despite spending $70k approx on a marketing\business plan which they are not following.

Despite the Liberal Government meeting recently with Council, there is nothing for Willow Court in the Budget. “At first glance there seems to be nothing in the budget for the major issues of Willow Court…” New Norfolk News 29th May 2015

A Councillor announced that on Friday 15th May after being asked what plans do the Council have for the site? The response was “NOTHING” (witnessed)

A Councillor announced on the same night that the keys would be handed over at the end of June.

A Councillor announced at a recent Council meeting that “Willow Court was a bloody eye sore”

A Councillor at a Council meeting also announced that “no-body wants it” referring to Willow Court.

A Councillor stated at the same meeting that the call for expressions of interest could take “up to 12 months”.

The Community House is moving into Bronte House without an impact study to know if there is any negative affect to the tourist potential of the site.

The Council is wanting to sign a lease with the Department of Health and Human Services because it will receive funds for ongoing restoration (one off), but will loose one of the main buildings of the site for tourist potential and education.

Funding is more readily available for Nationally Heritage listed sites which Willow Court is not. It has just recently been nominated for National Heritage listing. Why has the Council taken so many years to do this?

The DVC has spent 1.5 million dollars on restoration, $750 thousand of that was a state government grant, so where is the rest of the money for the assets and real estate since the DVC have been involved?

 

So while a local politician is smiling at you and saying trust me for all the truth, we should ask some of these questions and expect full answers.

It is surprising that Councillor Bester is using his personal blog site as the epiphany of truth.

History has indicate that any Government, local of otherwise should not be the only source of “trusted” information.

 

 

Continue Reading

New addition to Willow Court

Somebody is watching! New security is now visible at Willow Court despite people on social media helping others enter the site with their knowledge of security. While many people wish to see the site, the Derwent Valley Council is not allowing anyone except those that have had private tours escorted by Councillors. The next Council agenda has a closed section of the meeting dealing with Willow Court security. Also recorded on the Derwent Valley Council’s VANDALISM REPORT is a cost of $1825.00 for repairs for April. Also on the agenda is a proposal to sell some Council owned  land and the funds to go towards the restoration of Willow Court.

That if approval is obtained for the calling of Expressions of Interest for the sale of the George Street Land that the Mayor undertake a press release advising that expressions of interest will be called for the sale and that the proceeds from the sale will be directed to undertake restoration works at “Willow Court”.  

Also of interest is the Council’s plan to lease part of the Bronte Ward to the Derwent Valley Community House and the Department of Health and Human Services. We are still waiting for more information on this one and would love to see an impact study on the potential of tourism at Willow Court before any decision is formalised.DSCF0635

Continue Reading

A big weekend at Willow Court

DSCF0824It has been a big weekend at Willow Court and the place was buzzing today and yesterday with anyone who has a passion for the place. Friday started early for some and was the accumulation of months of research and sourcing of information, personal stories, interviews, meetings, rehearsals and the extensive hunting for authentic items for display and for costumes for the drama. The Governor of Tasmania Professor Kate Warner opened the Friends of Willow Court Display and Play which were advertised during the Tasmanian Heritage Month. Along with invited guests she looked through the professional display which was an intersection between the lives of people who served in conflicts or behind in the local community effort and the Lachlan Park Hospital’s history and the lives that these people had before, after and during such conflict. Limited themes were chosen which told this story and also the story of the consequences of such conflict and the care and compassion of others. The generous support of many people and businesses has to be acknowledged because without this community effort this wouldn’t have happened. A special thank you to those families that allowed us to respectfully tell the stories of their loved ones, patient and worker alike. Of particular interest to me was the story of returned serviceman Bruce McLean, who’s story of life within Millbrook Rise post WWII was told and while Bruce wasn’t the only person to return after conflict and time incarcerated as a prisoner of war, his is one of the limited stories we have permission to share.

Partners include:

Returned Serviceman’s League (RSL), New Norfolk

Masonic Lodge, New Norfolk

Tasmanian Heritage Council

Derwent Valley Players, New Norfolk

Derwent Valley Council

The Friends of Frascati, Willow Court

The Military Museum. Hobart

Business and organisations include:

Willow Court Antiques, New Norfolk

Antiques Warehouse, Hobart

NIDA School of acting, Sydney.

Coles Supermarket, Bridgewater

Woolworth’s Supermarket, New Norfolk

Top of the town Bakery, New Norfolk

The Handyman, Chris Salt, New Norfolk

St Mary’s College

Personal Supporters:

Mayor Martyn Evans

Craig Farrell MLC

Eric Hutchinson MP

Family of all the people displayed.

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

76 Years Ago Tomorrow

Lachlan Park Management and the Municipal Council are at it again! 76 years ago the long history of the tenuous relationship was again in dispute with Councillor Shoobridge stating “a few home truths were good for the Council” after Dr Charles Brothers opened up on the Councillors .

home truths at dinner, new norfolk council criticised

Continue Reading

Willow Court Fence

mms_img-1648682558_20150324T113237-991 mms_img-906583095_20150324T113238-003The start of the Willow Court Front Fence panels are being assembled outside the Barracks. This is an interesting design with lots of metal and bent top and bottom rails, there are also some metal spikes to go on top. This is going to be interesting to see the finished product and it is best to see it in it’s entirety as this will make a statement when anyone arrives at the site.

The fabrication of this fence, the new gates and the ramps for access to Bronte have held up the finishing date by some months. The remaining grounds will then be landscaped and hopefully the front of the Barracks greened up (again) and the site will be ready to hand over to the Derwent Valley Council.

Continue Reading

Willow Court For Sale or Lease

for sale WC
The Derwent Valley Council are about to discuss and ratify an expression of interest for the sale or lease of the Willow Court Heritage Precinct.

On Thursday the 26th of February I attended a public workshop with the Derwent Valley Council. This workshop didn’t have an agenda, but I assumed rightly so that it was about the future of Willow Court. From the public gallery where I sat the Councillors were to my right, Cr. Damian Bester who has been a long-time supporter of Willow Court and was elected after a few years of non-action at the site and after a public meeting he stood for Council, next to him was Cr. Lathey who at one stage voiced that he was on the Council in 2000 when the site was disposed of by the State Government. Alongside Barry Lathey are two of the newly elected Councillor’s, Frank Pearce and Paul Belcher. In the middle was the Mayor, Martyn Evans and to my left were the remaining Councillors Ben Shaw, Julie Triffett and James Graham.

We waited for any members of the public to come in and ask any questions of their elected Leaders during an open section of the Council meeting, but no-one took that opportunity. Later a representative, from the Friends of Frascatti sat in the back row behind me, next to the only other interested group representative, Aiden Sullivan from the Paranormal Investigation Unit.

The Mayor opened the session up with thoughts of the Councillors, one after the other they expressed their collective view of the future of Willow Court. There had clearly been much thought that had gone into what was being presented. We all listened as Barry Lathey started with his history from 2000, the “transaction good and bad” and we had “used up all the money for the site” and his disappointment of where we are at now. Damian Bester was “frustrated by the delay” with the now estimated new handover time of April\May 2015. Paul Belcher called it an “absolute eye sore” but it was Frank Peace who started to alert the Friends Committees to the Council’s direction when he stated that it would be opened up for “international expressions of interest”. This became a clear and a repeated theme as each Councillor expressed where they were at. It was the Council’s general opinion that all State and Federal funding resources had been totally exhausted and that the Port Arthur Authority are not interested in taking on the site.

Cr. James Graham had the idea of raising the collective rates by 8% and the Mayor quickly calculated the return, while a good idea it would be a brave Council that lifts the rates during a time of hardship and high unemployment, it would be what Sir Humphrey Applebee (Yes Prime Minister BBC Television) would call a “courageous decision”. It has shown that this Council had exhausted all ideas and funding options except for a generous donor who would have big pockets. At least $10 million dollars is needed to finish the conservation work to the desired standard as described in the conservation plan. The donor would then be able to run the site as a fully conserved tourist attraction.

The Mayor then opened up the floor to comments from the interested parties and there were a number of questions and responses. The APIU want a full plan to operate the site and this will be ready in 5 month, the Friends of Willow Court also will have a plan nearing completion soon to also operate the site. The Councillors all agreed that this was an unsafe site and that only a small number of rooms have had work and the remaining site is in a poor condition.

We all left subdued and somewhat reluctant to except the future plans that the DVC had expressed but not before asking what time frame this would take? The response would be at least 12 month to present the option before the council meeting in March and get together a proposal\synopsis funding document and advertise internationally. One more question was asked and that was, what happens if there isn’t any worthwhile replies? The Council then would offer the site back to the State Government.

I have had time to mull over the conversations and the position that was put to us and I now present my own response: I have visited the Port Arthur site and the Cascades Female Factory in preparation for the Friends of Willow Court to display the Willow Court site. I have been put through Thematic training so we present a professional tour and experience as good as any other site in Tasmania. Personally I have visited world heritage sites around the world and taken tours at as many as I could to gain a bigger international picture of where Willow Court sits in an international market. I have attended meetings of the Council’s own Committee, charged with the responsibility to create, run and market events at Willow Court. I am disappointed that an expression of interest is even being considered and disappointed that all I saw from the Derwent Valley Council was a joint “throwing up of arms” in frustration.

The Mayor told the gathered people how  Associate Professor Heather Burke had opened his eyes to the potential of the site in the subject of archaeology as Flinders University plan on using the site for the next 10-20 years. During the visits, supported by the Derwent Valley Council to study and see Port Arthur and the Cascades Female Factory I have a full realisation that Willow Court has an outstanding Tourist potential. Port Arthur lacks a building that has been preserved to the standard that Willow Court has and the Cascades Female Factory has an open yard which doesn’t even have any building structure contained within it’s boundary walls and yet both of these wonderful places have a wonderful thematic interpretation that, like Heather Burke’s comment should open the eyes of the Councillors to the real opportunity. If one was to become a cynic this early into the four year election cycle you could be forgiven for believing that to get re-elected the Councillors will need to get rid of the “elephant in the room”, that being Willow Court and yet I also understand their frustration of Governments that choose not to keep Australia’s heritage assets, physically and socially, in the condition they deserve.

At a recent meeting with the Friends of Willow Court the Mayor and Friends of Willow Court Council Representative Frank Peace met with the Committee and explained the proposal. During this time one of the Committee asked what ethical/social basis would be maintained as a community standard for any owner or lease holder. The answer was this was completely open. One could assume that there may not be any standard to comply with at all and any social memory or important architecture design may not be maintained . Another question was about the sitting tenant, being the “nearly ready to move in, Community House”. What provision had the council made for having a sitting tenant? Again there appear to be no answer to this.

My belief is that the Community needs to stand up and state it’s beliefs and purposed intentions and expectations of the Heritage site and task the Derwent Valley Council with that agenda as they have already done so in the past. The expression of interest process is believed to take another 12 months, which could mean that the site sits idle for another 12 months waiting for future vandalism. This is still a “Troubled Asylum”. The only thing we know is that there won’t be a KFC in the Barracks! Click here to read the DVC’s March Agenda Item.

for lease

 

 

Continue Reading

Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority take on Willow Court.

Untitled

Mayor Martyn Evans reported on Willow Court’s progress to the Southern Tasmanian Council Authority in the June 2014 report, which is available on the Council website, (link below) It would appear that the Mayor will be working on policy issues relating to Willow Court with the CEO of the STCA and that the CEO will be the secondary spokesperson in relation to the ongoing progress of Willow Court. It is heartening to see that the STCA Board will actively support to redevelop and restore the remaining Willow Court site. It is unclear how that help will materialize with the information available, but we can only hope it will help in obtaining funds for future works.

 

Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority

Quarterly Report to Members

June 2014

  1. Portfolio Positions item 11, Item 10.4 in full on DVC website

Portfolio position: Willow Court

Background:

Willow Court was established in New Norfolk in the early 1830’s. It is a historic precinct that offers the rare opportunity to embrace Tasmania’s convict history whilst also providing a fantastic community asset.

The Derwent Valley Council bought the entire site from the State Government when it was decommissioned as a psychiatric facility. Since that time some of the newer buildings have been sold and are currently under private development. But as an extremely old and historic site it is the Council’s view that it is important that some of the site, particularly the old Royal Derwent Reserve Buildings, remain in public hands.

There has been significant work undertaken on the site in the past few years. With tourism through attractions, festivals and events playing a bigger role in the State’s economy the redeveloped historic Willow Court site provides the opportunity to harness these sectors to deliver economic and cultural benefits.

The site is starting to return to its former glory, but a significant funding injection is still required to finish the project. Recently a number of Mayor’s and the STCA CEO visited the Willow Court site and saw first hand the ongoing development works taking place on the site.

Since 2012 the Willow Court Conservation Special Committee has undertaken works totaling over $2 million. The Committee now has fundraising goals, as well as plans to lobby government for further support to undertake the work on restoration of the heritage precinct. Funding in the order of $8 million is required to complete the site’s restoration.

Position and Actions:

  • The STCA supports the ongoing maintenance and development of the Willow Court site
  • The Board undertakes to actively support the project to redevelop and restore the remainder of the historic Willow Court site
  • Appoints Mayor Evans to work with the CEO on policy issues relating to Willow Court and to act as the secondary spokesperson on the issue
  • Appoints the Lord Mayor to act as the STCA spokesperson on Willow Court
Continue Reading

Strategic thinking?

mobile 024

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Derwent Valley Council has been in discussion with the Derwent Valley Community House, Willow Court Conservation Committee and the Department of Health and human services, but not the Friends of Willow Court about the use of Bronte building as a new Community House. While one can’t criticize the good works of the Community houses around Tasmania this raises concerns over the Derwent Valley Council’s ability to communicate, even with it’s own Special Committee of the DVC. It would appear that a healthy conversation is taking place, but not including the very Committee the Derwent Valley Council set up to run the site after its part conservation completion. There are some things that would need to be discussed and finer points and details worked out when sharing Tasmania’s newest Tourist attraction. Has the Council planned for parking for users of the Community House and tourist visitors? What are the shared costs? What is the access to facilities for school groups and what protection is in place for younger students visiting the heritage site? From the outside this looks like another “opportunity” planned decision, and not something that was in the expensive DVC/Malcolm McDonald plan for the heritage site.

Derwent Valley Council
Special Council Meeting Agenda
14 October 2014

5

Discussion
Over the past few years council has been in discussions with Community House and
also the owner of the building in regard to its continued usage, and possible share
arrangements. The owner of the building has and continues to be interested in using
the site for business opportunities but is limited by the current lease conditions.
Council has also had discussions with Community House in regard to a possible
relocation to Carinya, but there were issues in regard to which part of this site as well
as the distance from the township and the community garden.
Basically all negotiations have stalled. The owner of the building, in recent times has
also been discussion options for their current site, but difficulty arose in regard to
expenditure on a site that is not owned by a government entity.
Recently Council has been in discussions with Community House and DHHS in
regard to the use of part of the Bronte building for Community House. There is some
concern in regard to the area that they now have requested, but there may be an
opportunity for some negotiation in regard to shared spaces.
The Department of Health and Human Services have advised by e-mail on the 23rd
September2014 as follows:
“Thank you for arranging for the Mayor Martyn Evans and Councillor Chris Lester
to meet the DHHS project team at Bronte on the 2nd September 2014.
DHHS would like to progress without prejudice formal offer of the Department funds
for the infrastructure and capital works for Bronte to enable tenancy by Derwent
Valley Community House.
DHHS has a limited quantum of funds allocated to Derwent Valley Community House
and has received endorsement to allocate these funds to Bronte in the agreement that
Council offer a long term lease to Dewent Valley Community House (DVCH)
The lease of Bronte is between DVCH and Council. However it is anticipated that
given the substantial capital improvements that DHHS is willing to invest into a
Council property that consideration would be given to the conditions of the lease to
ensure a viable tenancy for DVCH.
I understand the next stage is to gain Council approval to offer the tenancy to DVCH.
Do you require any written or further advice from DHHS to gain endorsement?
I am away for the next three days, and I hope that you may be able to have a
conversation with my colleague regarding the scope of works and timeframes.
The matter was discussed at the last meeting of the Willow Court Conservation
Special Committee and gained this committees support.”

Derwent Valley Council
Special Council Meeting Agenda
14 October 2014
6
The matter was also discussed at a recent Council workshop as some concern was
again raised in regard to the area of the Bronte Building they require.

FULL AGENDA HERE

Continue Reading

Friends of Willow Court Chairwoman’s report.

page 1The Annual General Meeting of the Friends of Willow Court special committee was held last Wednesday night. Guest speaker was David Llewellyn the Chairman of the Willow Court Conservation Special Committee. Mrs Anne Salt gave the committee and visiting members of the pubic a rundown of the years events and issues that the committee had been involved in. While the year has been slower than other years, it is beginning to ramp up as the immanent opening of the heritage precinct opens its doors to the public.

 

Continue Reading

Derwent Valley Council gag order proposed.

gag

 

An interesting agenda item is on the Derwent Valley Councils agenda for tonight’s meeting and deserves a bit of public scrutiny. The item of concern is under the heading

1.4 Powers and functions of the special committee (page 15)

  1. The Chairperson or any representative of any committee is not authorised to undertake a press release or communicate any decision of the committee prior to approval being given by the Mayor.

All information discussed and actioned from any Special Committee will now have to gain approval from the Mayor to communicate outside of that meeting.  A couple of comments are worthy here; the Mayor has been very slow in responding to requests for information from the Friends of Willow Court Special Committee. The other point to be made is how good a job is the Derwent Valley Council doing in getting the word out about happenings at Willow Court and its preservation? The last media release was in JUNE 2013, yes that is right, JUNE 2013 over a year ago, so not a record that you would be proud of.

It would appear that this is more to do with a political agenda than it is about letting the rate payers of the Derwent Valley know how their rates are being spent. Also if committee members were unable to attend a meeting, but rang the next day to ask what transpired, the Chairperson or any other committee member would have to first contact the Mayor to get permission to divulge the information. Does this rule apply to Councillors who provide information to the community via blog spots or a personal news website?

There are a great number of Special Committee’s formed by the Derwent Valley Council made up of many people freely giving up their time volunteering to progress the Derwent Valley Council’s agenda and not to deal with gag bylaws that have a political agenda.

There are normal committee processes that decisions can stay “in committee” until it is decided that it can be released, this is normal professional practice and would apply when the information is of a sensitive nature or related to ongoing inquiries or has some commercial sensitivity. Having this extra burden on Special Committees means that their work will now be locked up. In some cases for years to come.

Read the Agenda in full.

Continue Reading
1 4 5 6 7 8 13