Dangerous “investigation”

The “Owners of Willow Court” allowed the following people to “investigate” the tunnel under Willow Court, according to these paranormal enthusiasts in their film below. As there are multiple owners in that area where the tunnel is, it was either the Derwent Valley Council or the Pearce’s who took on the legal safety of these people.

The video shows these people entering what is the old sewage tunnel and crawling through the root bound area. The logic of the height of the tunnel would help them to understand its use but they want people to “comment” on their discovery in the hope of keeping alive the idea that it was used for transport of patients from the Derwent River to the Hospital, under the township.

They appear to have not taken any precautions to indicate dangerous gas emissions or low oxygen levels nor any equipment that would normally be required by WH&S in respect of working in confined spaces.

All in all this is disturbingly dangerous and could leave the “permission givers” open to legal claims and vicarious liability.

In contrast the Associate Professor Heather Burke from Flinders University investigated the tunnel as a high level Archaeologist back in 2015 and supplied us with a podcast. Both her and her colleague used all the safety equipment and monitored for safe breathing levels of oxygen throughout the investigation.

Tunnel investigation podcast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDv0zj36XQg

Continue Reading

Open Day photos

Head over to the Gallery/Open day and Events Tab (Click image below) and see the latest photos from the last Open Day conducted by the Flinders University and the Friends of Willow Court.

An estimated 200-300 people visited the site with most taking advantage of the four Tour Guides who took people through thematic tours of the Barracks and Carlton yard. Once in the yard the visitors were told of the current archaeology activity and what was being found.

Inside the Barracks there was a display of previously found and restored items, mostly from the Pearce Collection, along with interpretive posters of items found under the Barracks during previous digs.

Click the image below to open the full article 

Continue Reading

Nurses worried

This article from the Derwent Valley Gazette is from the 17th January 1990 and talks about how the “Patients” weren’t ready for the community. 

news paper article 

While history would say that this was a false concern, there were some instances were life on the outside was a disturbing and frightening prospect for some Patients, but on the whole the de-institutionalisation program was a success.

It also came about as Australia had obligations to support the Human Rights of people living with disabilities which were signed in 1948. Further Australian signatures remained also on our agreement under the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. 

It was once described to me that there were three types of Staff at the hospital,

  1. Staff that understood and wanted to know how they would fit into any new support arrangements
  2. Staff that understood, but preferred to work elsewhere.
  3. Staff that are still wondering where or why people have gone. 

Looking at the current changes in the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) and it has some similarities to the changes experienced many years ago as people living with disabilities take up their full citizenship within the community. 

 

 

Continue Reading

Willow Court Redevelopment “For Sale Or Lease In Total Or In Part”

 

It’s official, now there is a sign to prove it. The Derwent Valley Council are looking to off load it’s ownership or lease a piece of Tasmanian History.

What exactly is the “Willow Court Redevelopment” One would assume it is the Barracks, C, A, B Wards and Frascati House, but it’s not clear by the sign and confusing for potential buyers.

This new sign now sits on the Security office on the Avenue at New Norfolk. A search of the Real Estate Agents website does not show any result.

Continue Reading

14 day “Willow Court Fact Challenge” is on

No automatic alt text available.

The fact challenge is on with both the Willow Court Facebook Page and our Willow Court Facebook History Group receiving daily facts for 14 days. Here are the last three day’s facts. All come from the 1831 report into the hospital and health systems of the early Tasmanian Colony.

Day 1:
“Staffing continued to be a problem in the medical services and also in the orphan schools. Dr Scott at the Colonial Hospital, Hobart and Dr Officer at New Norfolk both did a reasonably competent job as far as the facilities allowed them to do so but for lesser staff they were principally dependant on convicts whose competence was patchy to say the least and cleanliness was never a notable characteristic of any of the hospitals.” On convict attendants the 1831 board wrote. “When convicts have been employed in this situation at Launceston and New Norfolk, irregularity and peculation (to steal or take dishonestly money, especially public funds, or property entrusted to one’s care); embezzle) have been the invariable consequences.”

Day 2:
Of the principal hospitals, only New Norfolk stood up to scrutiny. The Colonial Hospital, Hobart, though on a good site, was far too small. The board reported “on entering the Hospital, it has a crowded and dirty appearance, the beds are too close together and there is no classification of Diseases” There was an average daily number of 92 patients and room only for 67 “the overplus of 25 have slept on the floor, or in fact wherever they could find room to lie down” The lunatics quarters were “small, confined and insecure” and they were ill cared for. The board commented “these…unfortunate creatures have now become a public nuisance from the manner in which they are allowed to roam at large, in many instances indecently exposing themselves in the streets. The board recommended…”removal of the lunatics to New Norfolk to ease the pressure further.”

Day 3:
In 1831 “The hospital in Launceston was a small Weather Boarded building capable of holding 20 male patients and only two female patients..” New Norfolk Hospital (Willow Court) was already established.

Day 4:
The New Norfolk Hospital was primarily an invalid depot, but had a hospital section which was to serve the invalids during periods of acute sickness and to provide for the needs of the surrounding district. A wing for lunatics was completed in 1833 capable of accommodating 40 patients of each sex.

Day 5:
The hospitals were of course principally intended for convicts in government service. Assigned convict were intended to be the responsibility of their masters and they would pay an overall rate of 5s, per day for in-patient and out-patient treatment for their servants, or alternatively 1s, per day for actual treatment. This was all too rarely paid and difficult to enforce.

Day 6:
Free paupers were to be admitted without charge, if the doctor certified their admission essential and if a clergyman or magistrate certified they were objects of charity.

Day 7:

Governor Arthur gave his attention in 1827 to the condition of the aged and chronic sick. In a memo to the Colonial Secretary in April of that year he writes, “I have reason to think that the Invalids supported by the Crown have very little care taken of them and it is necessary that the establishment should be places altogether on a better footing” Later he instructed that the “miserable house” hired by the Crown Hobart Town was to be given up and the invalids transferred to the barracks at New Norfolk under the charge of Dr Robert Officer.

Day 8

Robert Officer was born near Montrose, Scotland, October 3rd 1800, and educated at Marischal College, Aberdeen, where he graduated M. A. in 1818. He graduated and obtained a diploma as a member of the royal College of Surgeons, England. He traveled to Van Diemen’s Land on August 27th, 1821 by the “Castle Forbes” as the ship’s surgeon and arrived on the 1st March 1822. 

He was appointed immediately by Governor Sorell as Government Medical Officer for New Norfolk and adjacent regions including a surgeonship in the old Hobart Town Hospital. 

Later he was appointed as Surgeon Superintendent of the New Norfolk Hospital. He retired in his early fifties to reside at Hallgreen a property he had purchase near the New Norfolk Bridge. 

In 1853 he was elected to the Tasmanian Legislative Council twice and was later Knighted by Queen Victoria in 1869. Among many position he was the Chairman of the New Norfolk Asylum Commissioners. 

He dies at Hallgreen, 8th July 1879.

Day 9:

The invalids went from one miserable situation to another. Dr Officer wrote to the Government in November 1828 complaining of their housing. (at New Norfolk)
“The prevailing diseases in this Establishment consist of chronic Rheumatism, Paralysis, Affections of the Eyes and Joints and I need to say how absolutely necessary a comfortable habitation is for such cases. Many of them have been greatly aggravated by the wretched conditions of the hovels they habitat… The Barracks as you know consists of two apartments, which during the rain are inundated both from above and below, in which cooking, washing and all other necessary operations are performed and in which the patients are huddled together”Day: 10
“An early problem was the effect on the inmates of the lack of any occupation, for persons that were decrepit rather than totally helpless. Some of the men would hire themselves out for odd jobs around the township and unfortunately used the proceeds to get drunk and attract notice to themselves.”

Day: 10
“An early problem was the effect on the inmates of the lack of any occupation, for persons that were decrepit rather than totally helpless. Some of the men would hire themselves out for odd jobs around the township and unfortunately used the proceeds to get drunk and attract notice to themselves.”

Day 11:
“New Norfolk continued to serve partly as a hospital for the sick of the local district until 1848 when it was made over entirely as a mental hospital” Invalids were sent to Impression Bay, 26 older men refused to go, 13 later followed the instruction to leave and the remaining 13 men, Governor Denison instructed that they be “ejected with as little violence as possible”.

Day 12:
During Dr Casey’s time the Colonial Times reported that the practice of allowing sightseers to visit the hospital was discontinued, so that the patients were no longer “made sport of to amuse the visitors” 1840’s

Day 13:
Although New Norfolk approached the Hydro Electric Department in 1915 for the provision of power, it was not until 1923 that New Norfolk was served with this source of energy. Prior to 1923 New Norfolk homes were lit with kerosene lamps and candles. For those of the more affluent residents used gas lights, a combination of carbide and water. The lighting for the streets of New Norfolk had been, up until that time, by way of privately generated current from the Mental Diseases Hospital at New Norfolk.

Day 14:
At New Norfolk Asylum in spite of complaints from the Board, for over 300 patients there was for many years only one Doctor, and he also administered the institution and supervised the farm. 1877.

Today ends the 14 day Fact Challenge. I would like to thank those people who encouraged me to keep the work and the history going for Willow Court.

But now it’s your turn…later this year I will do another fact challenge however, the challenge is that YOU research and present one fact. It could be from your lived experience, or like me, from reference material.

Keep in mind that your fact must not be derogatory towards the previous residents or staff.

Please sent your fact to me by private message on facebook or email me at mark@willowcourttasmania.org so I can sort them ready for publication.

I’m looking forward in reading your experiences and knowledge.

Cheers

Mark Krause

Continue Reading

Entire Site for sale

There are three main owners of the west side of the old Royal Derwent Hospital, known as the Willow Court Training Centre and each owner is currently offering their site, in whole or in part, for sale or lease. This hasn’t happened since the Tasmanian Government sold the whole site after the closure in 2001. The only area that isn’t for sale is the Administration Building and old School (currently the Derwent Valley Community House) which is close to vacating and moving to a new site.

Heritage Precinct:

The Derwent Valley Council have approved an Expression of Interest for the use of the remaining sections of the Barracks, C and A Wards and also Frascati House. Although enquiries to gain access to this document have failed as there is still work to be done before it is ready.

The Oval Wards:

The owner of the Oval Wards, D, E and G has also put out an expression of interest by Tender on the site. This site is currently under dispute with the Derwent Valley Council who are seeking legal advise according to their last agenda. As far back as the opening day of Dark Mofo at WIllow Court, I was informed that the DVC were going to reclaim these buildings due to the fact that no progress was made toward converting them to residential accommodation by the developer as was agreed.

Agenda Thursday, 18th January 2018

That the General Manager report to the February meeting with independent legal advice regarding the Council’s options to either complete the sale of the property at Willow Court known as the “Oval Buildings” (formerly Wards D, E and G) or recover the properties from
the purchaser.

Rationale

This issue has been dragging on for too long, with conflicting advice being provided at various times. Councillors are in need of independent legal advice in order to make an informed decision on how best to move forward with this.

The current Tender process is advertising that the property would be a “Great opportunity for investor / developer to redevelop or ‘land bank'”.  For those that may not have come across this term “land banking”, the oval Wards are a good example of “land banking” as is Claremont Primary School. Both buildings have been allow to fall into a state of disrepair and be subjected to vandals. However the land still increases in value as time moves forward. The little that is done to the property the higher the profit.

If the Derwent Valley Council regain these Wards and land we have to look at their long history of management of the buildings and the site to consider if this is a good idea. The Council has owned the site from 2003 and most of the current damage to each building happened while under their control and management. Offering it for sale again, as it is now, may allow the Council more control over the next owners aspirations. Any potential owner would still be subject to the Heritage and Council restrictions that currently apply, so the extra cost and potential community benefit that the Council would undertake with rate payer money is not yet clear. The current dispute between the owner and the DVC would certainly detract any potential investor, one would assume.

The Commercial area:

All the privately owned section around Patchwork Cafe (including the cafe) are also for sale through an expression of interest process with some buildings maintaining a current lease. There are 5 separate strata titles in Willow Court. including a number of buildings constructed from 1860 to the early 1960s. The advertisement includes the Ladies Cottage which is described as; “One of the most historic buildings available anywhere in Tasmania”. This is the second oldest building on the whole Hospital site circa 1860. All buildings are either is a state of disrepair or have undergone some level of work allowing for occupation.

 

Continue Reading

Expression of Interest (Sale or Lease)

The long awaited Expression Of Interest (EOI) concept for the sale or lease of Willow Court was announced nearly three years ago (March 2015) and on the 30.12.2017 I was sent an email from Cr Bester stating;

The Council recently approved the release of an Expression of Interest document… he goes on to state that no EOI have been supplied for the group of Councillor to view.

The last part of the statement is interesting seeing that the final document has not been issued! Telling the public that the process is advanced and that they are waiting for EOI is “Fake News”.

 

This has been the Council’s prefered option to deal with the publicly owned Heritage Site that they currently are the Custodians. I was keen to understand the context that was going to be part of the decision making process around the lease or sale of our Tasmanian Heritage Site, so I wrote to the Derwent Valley Council to:

  1. Ask for the Expression of interest documentation and,
  2. To have supplied, any related documentation around any decisions around the type of use for the site. (ethics)

I think it is important that the Council, who are the current Custodians of the site, explain the context by which they are going to sell or lease the site and what sort of activities they are ethically bound by heritage and by their own collective thoughts to allow on the site. At this stage we have only heard from a small number of individual Councillors who have had a range of personal opinions, but nothing in writing from them as a collective.

I believe that our Tasmanian Heritage needs the utmost consideration when a public entity such as the State Government or a Local Government body decide to offer our Heritage for sale to private enterprise.

I have floated the concept at meetings that without a guiding document around this the Council could well sell the site for a theme park. While most Councillors reject this notion, without some guiding document, what I suggest could become a reality.

At the last Council meeting (December) a member of the public asked a question of the Council and in doing so stated that the Oval Wards (D, E, F, G) and land were sold for $43,500 while an offer of $200,000 sat on the table. It is important to note that no Councillors choose to confirm or deny the figures announced by the member of the public and the context of the sale was not mentioned.

I received an email back from the The Executive Assistant, Melinda Pearce which appears to contradict the announcement made earlier about the release of the document itself. 

“I can confirm that an EOI has not been publicly released yet”

So as a Tasmanian interested in Tasmanian Heritage, in particular Willow Court, I am left confused by these contradictory statements. Does this Council know what it is doing with this process? I would suggest that clearly there are issues with the system that has already taken nearly three years to produce the EOI and clearly there are issue between Councillors about the actual release.

We can only wait to see what ethical boundaries they have placed on any interested party who wishes to use the site which they are the Tasmanian Custodians!

 

 

Continue Reading

Full Ree Pettifer Report 1989

I have now uploaded the full report (61 pages) onto the “articles tab” on this website

 

REVIEW OF CLINICAL NURSING PRACTICE
INSTITUTIONAL LIVING PROGRAM 

WILLOW COURT CENTRE

R. PETTIFER
SEPTEMBER, 1989

 

Final Report

This is the full report that was claimed to have closed the institution, along with the original letter to the then Minister for Health and Human Services the Hon Judy Jackson. This was an unpublished document here for your enjoyment and reading pleasure.

“It would be easy to lay the blame on the nursing staff for the living conditions and standards of care of residents at Willow Court Centre. To do so however would be to oversimplify the forces at play in the working life of the nursing staff at Willow Court”.

Ree Pettifer 1989

 

(This replaces a part copy that I had already stored on this site)

Continue Reading

PURKISS Juanita (June)

January 9, 2018
PURKISS Juanita (June) Died peacefully at New Norfolk District Hospital on January 8th, 2018. Daughter of Bill and Jean Herbert (both dec). Sister to Bill Herbert and Sheila and Rex Cleary. Loving aunt to her nieces and nephews. Now at peace.

Published in: The Advocate

Wards K1 and K2

It is with great sadness that Willow Court has lost one of its longest serving staff members and keepers of the history. I had the privilege of recording an interview with June Purkiss a couple of years ago with Anne Salt the chairperson of the Friends of Willow Court and found her to a knowledgeable, warm and respected lady.

June was able to shed light on much of the history from her start at the Hospital in 1946 and even was able to remember earlier than that when her father William (Bill) Herbert worked as a bricklayer on Wards E and D around the oval in the early 1930’s. Bill also became a long serving and respected staff member in 1938.

I have included a previously unreleased section of that interview and another podcast that was a recording of June’s memories for the “walking through time” project which can also be found on the Derwent Valley Council Website.

Continue Reading

Reflective Garden

Last week I had the opportunity to speak with some of the Friends of Frascati House (FoFH) as they inspected the new layout and progress of the Reflective Garden, sited between the rear of the Frascati House (1834) and The Avenue.

Over the past 2-3 years the “Flourish Mental Health Action in Our Hands” self advocacy group have been in discussions with the Derwent Valley Council and the Friends of Frascati House to see if it is possible to also contribute a plaque for the Gardens.

I have been involved in this committee for over twelve months and while there has been some progression, little physical evidence has happened. Last week I was able to have a discussion with Councillor Bester and Mr Greg Winton, General Manager along with three members of the Frascati House Committee who agreed to further discussions with Flourish. 

It would appear that the wording of the proposed plaque that the FoFH have submitted to Council and the wording on the plaque that Flourish self advocacy group have proposed are almost identical.

I am currently waiting for Jess Dallas who is the Council’s Project Manager to contact me back with the wording*. If both groups can agree, there is an opportunity for a plaque to be installed to remember past residents, staff and community members that were involved in the Hospital’s 174 years of operation.

Frascati House Committee and the Derwent Valley Council have also considered some proposed insensitive activities in the old home but it is nice to see that there is an opportunity to have some respectful and sensitive activity on the site. 

*p.s. Jess Dallas had sent the wording but due to a communication issue I only received it yesterday. Thanks Jess.

APIU, DVC may approve tour of “Satan’s House”!

Friends of Frascati House looking at the Reflective Garden
Continue Reading